On Tuesday 21 October 2003 10:23 pm, Avi Bryant wrote:
> Well, I agree this can be a problem, but I'm not sure what the
> solution is.  For example, it could use a relative path, but I think
> that in many cases you don't actually want this - personally, I
> would want all of my images to share the *same* package-cache, no
> matter where they were on my disk.  Ditto with SM - I don't see much
> point in having redundant, project-specific caches.  But obviously
> this breaks when I move my image to a different machine
> (particularly to a different platform).
I have an "inisqueak" script that symlinks:
 squeakmap directory
 package cache
 EMAIL files
 sources file
 changesets save directory
 my.prefs
and it all works quite well.
--
Ned Konz